January 10, 2013

Coming Soon: the Classic TV Variety Show Blogathon

Next month I'll be taking part in the Classic TV Blog Association's latest blogathon, on TV variety shows. The last one, on classic horror movie hosts, was back in October and was a tremendous success.

The variety show truly is a part of television's past, a chapter that doesn't really seem likely to make a comeback.  In some ways that's a pity, but in other ways it's almost a relief - the axis of modern entertainment has pivoted to the point where it's increasingly hard to think of who could host, let alone appear on, such a show today.

Perhaps we are best left with memories of the past, and there's no better way to relive them than through us!  So come along and share the fun with  Dean Martin!  Jerry Lewis!  Judy Garland!  Ed Sullivan!  The Brady Bunch!  Paul Lynde!  (See what I mean about the dropoff in star power?)

If you want to know more about the schedule, or are perhaps interested in participating yourself, check out the details here. TV

January 8, 2013

Review: Carol for Another Christmas

From my latest piece for TVParty!:

A couple of years or so ago, I wrote an article for TVParty! on a series of made-for-TV movies produced by the United Nations to commemorate the 25th anniversary of its founding. It was hailed at the time as a significant event in television, and yet today hardly anyone remembers it, including the UN itself. (I know, because I called a librarian at the UN and got the vocal equivalent of a blank stare when I asked her about it.)

My curiosity had been piqued by a TV Guide article about the first special in the series, Carol for Another Christmas, written by Rod Serling and directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz. It was broadcast for the first and only time on December 28, 1964 (since then it’s been available only at the Paley Center in New York, the UCLA archives, or in the bootleg market), and in the intervening 48 years it’s attracted something of a cult following, along the lines of “It’s Serling, for God’s sake!” Some even referred to it as a “lost classic.” The fact that most critics had said it wasn’t very good was almost beside the point for them. So when TCM announced they’d be airing Carol for Another Christmas on December 16, I thought it might be a good idea to cut through the myth and rumor with a look at the actual movie.

[...]

So what do we make of this? Despite the negative reviews that had come out at the time, I was willing to set it all aside and judge it not on rumor or hearsay, but fact. That lasted through the opening credits and the initial, suitably dark scene, until the dialogue started. It was all downhill from there.

Your feelings about the questions debated in the story probably depend on your own political beliefs. Serling and Mankiewicz were political liberals, deeply committed to the United Nations and its mission. Having said that, even liberals will be put off by the shrillness of the script and the paper-thin one-dimensional characters. From the first, the movie plays like a bad version of a bad Twilight Zone episode (and, for all the greatness of that series, there were many). Marc Scott Zicree, author of The Twilight Zone Companion, said that “Serling has two poles in his writing. There’s his powerful, human-oriented writing, and his very didactic writing, and ‘Carol’ falls on the didactic side.” These characters are really “caricatures”, figureheads for Serling’s political polemics. They don’t talk to each other, but at each other. As a critic once said of a Serling-penned Twilight Zone script, it sounded like a bunch of Rod Serlings sitting around a table talking to each other.

Read the entire piece here.

***

In that article, I alluded to evidence that the version of Carol for Another Christmas shown on TCM might not, in fact, have been the original version.  In question: the absence of Henry Mancini's lovely theme, which many critics agreed was the best part of Carol:

I’d figured the theme would have been used for either the opening or closing credit scene; instead, for each we were given a series of Christmas carols by a children’s choir. Combined with the strange look of the opening graphics, I’m convinced that this movie was altered from its original presentation, and Mancini’s theme was deleted in favor of the carols.

That suspicion has now been verified by two sources: Zachary Kelley, who provided an extensive review of Carol a couple of years ago, told me that the copy he had watched did contain Mancini's theme, and that the credits did not have the superimposed, added-at-a-later-date look.

And Chip Arcuri, at the wonderful Yule Log site (and if you've never gone there, make it your mission between now and next Christmas) confirms that not only was Mancini's theme missing from the opening title montage, his name was deleted from the credits, and nobody knows why.

I spoke with Felice Mancini tonight and she told me that she has absolutely no idea why her father's music was removed from TCM's print of the film. She's especially disappointed because it's one of her favorites of her father tunes. She's going check into it to see why this happened.

So while we've solved one mystery - seeing the long-ago show - we've created another one.  Somehow I suspect that Dickens, who wrote those "scary ghost stories of Christmases long ago" that Andy Williams sings about in "The Most Wonderful Time of the Year," would be amused by the whole thing. TV  

January 5, 2013

This week in TV Guide: January 6, 1973

Once upon a time there were shows on television called “scripted series.” What this meant was that someone, or perhaps a number of people, would sit down in a room, working at a typewriter, and compose a “script”. These people were called “writers”. A second group of people, called “actors”, would then be hired to read the lines in these scripts, playing “characters” that had been described by the “writers” in the “script”. The script was what you might call a little story, with a beginning, a middle and an end. A number of these stories would be made, and then shown on television in a recurring pattern, once a week, at a specific time. The resulting product was called a “series”, and for many years this format was the backbone of the television schedule.

I know all of this might be hard for you younger viewers out there to believe, given that reality television has dominated the landscape the last few years. But that all began to change on Thursday, January 11, 1973 with the premiere of a new documentary series on PBS called An American Family. For 12 episodes we watched the real-life story of the Loud family of Santa Barbara, California—husband and wife Bill and Pat, and their five children, Lance, Kevin, Grant, Delilah and Michele—all played out in front of the cameras of PBS affiliate WNET.

The show had been filmed over the course of seven months in 1971, and debuted to great expectations. The famed anthropologist Margaret Mead, in her TV Guide preview, called the format “as significant as the invention of drama or the novel.” This was unscripted television as it had never been seen before, telling a story in which nobody knew the ending. It was part family drama, part cultural mirror, part encounter group. During the course of the series the Louds would separate (and later divorce), their son Lance would come out as a homosexual, and the concept of “family” would be completely redefined for a new generation.

Much of the drama—and the appeal—came from seeing the family fall apart before our very eyes. For example, Pat announced to Bill that she wanted a divorce and asked him to move out of the house —right there in front of the cameras. Presumably this was the moment Bill heard about it for the first time. It was something like watching a train wreck. Today we’re more accustomed to living our private lives in public; indeed, for many people there is no such thing as “private,” and they view that as a good thing. However, back in the day, nothing could have been further from the truth. Divorce was a stigma, homosexuality even more of one, and unless you were a celebrity penning a tell-all book—and remember, back then, most scandals were hushed up; you just didn’t talk about these things in polite company.

The show was controversial from the outset and remains so to this day. The producer, Craig Gilbert, was accused by the filmmakers, Alan and Susan Raymond, of instigating drama for benefit of the cameras.* The Louds would claim that the film (some 300 hours had been accumulated in those seven months) had been edited to make things look worse than they were. And there was more than a suggestion that the whole thing epitomized an unsavory kind of voyeurism.

*Said Alan Raymond, "We were at odds with Craig over the treatment of the family. There were numerous confrontations where we tried to raise the question about whether the experiment was veering off course.”

In reading this, you’re probably leaping to the same conclusion I had: An American Family marks the beginning of reality TV. For example, Lance would later say that the series “fulfilled ‘the middle-class dream that you can become famous for being just who you are.’” On the other hand, there are those who would argue that it ain’t necessarily so: these weren’t strangers thrown into a house together, for example, nor were they reacting to artificially contrived situations. They didn’t have the self-awareness of celebrity, since the show didn’t air until over a year after filming had been completed. Regardless, I think you could make the case (and I would) that An American Family broke down barriers—societal, media—that would allow reality television to fester and take root.

So I think you can make a case that An American Family was the first "reality" show.  But was it reality? Can anyone truly be “real” when they’re in front of cameras? Can they really claim to be “unaware” of their presence? Gilbert would say,”Going in there with a camera, of course it affected the family, and of course it affected those of us who made it. But no one can know for sure exactly how.”

However one chooses to view it, there’s no question, as the philosopher Jean Baudrillard wrote, that the series was “a symptom of our altered relationship with reality, characterized by ‘dissolution of TV in life, dissolution of life in TV.’” At the end of her TV Guide article, Mead suggests that An American Family may well be turn out to be more controversial than anyone might imagine: “In an age when so many people are jaded and apathetic, convinced that their own lives are not as interesting or important as those created by writers of fiction, it comes very close to the bone. I think An American Family will change their minds.”

t  t  t

I always enjoy "Year in Review" pieces, and it's clear that the editors of TV Guide thought I wasn't alone, since they advertise the 1972 review as "A special section you'll want to save." I'm not quite sure I had that conscious thought when I saved this issue, but I did anyway, and I'm glad.

So let's see what made 1972 such a special year—I'm flipping through the pages as I type this. Hmm. Big story is Nixon's trip to China, and later to the Soviet Union. I really don't know whether or not we get so excited about things like this now, but trust me: in 1972 this was a big, big deal. It's often said that only Nixon could have gone to China at that time, because of his anti-Communist bona fides. Nixon probably should have won the Nobel Peace Prize for that, but 19 months after this issue appeared, he was out of office.


Yasser Arafat did win the Nobel Peace Prize, in 1994, but in 1972 he was the mastermind of the Summer Olympic massacre that took place in Munich on September 5. Television viewers were held spellbound throughout the drama, and Jim McKay won acclaim for his coverage. The great Austrian skiier Karl Schranz was thrown out of the Winter Olympics for professionalism. That most assuredly would not be a big deal today.

J. Edgar Hoover, director of the FBI for 48 years, died on May 2. Jackie Robinson, first black man in major-league baseball, died on October 24, days after having thrown out the first ball at a World Series game. That World Series was won by the Oakland A's, capping a shortened season due to a players' strike that delayed the opening. The Lakers won the NBA championship, the Cowboys won the Super Bowl.

Serious social issues were examined in more detail on television in 1972.  Besides An American Family, there was the movie That Certain Summer, starring Hal Holbrook and Martin Sheen, which dealt with a teen-aged boy who discovered that his father was a homosexual. Bridget Loves Bernie, a sitcom about "Jewish boy marries Irish Catholic girl," started out as the highest-rated show of the year, but lasted only a season.  

They also were discussed on the news. Senator Tom Eagleton, George McGovern's running mate on the Democratic ticket, was forced off after news broke that he'd suffered from depression and had been treated with electroconvulsive therapy. He was replaced by Sargent Shriver. A picture in TV Guide shows the electoral vote total from late on Election Night: Nixon 508, McGovern 17. Nixon would go on to win 521-17.

And I remember all of this. Can it possibly be that long ago?

t  t  t

ABC late-nite fail - Same as it ever was
This was the week that Jack Paar returned to network television after an absence of almost eight years. He was the opening salvo in ABC's new late-night gambit, Wide World of Entertainment. Paar and Dick Cavett would each appear one week a month; the other two weeks would be filled with movies, comedy specials and variety shows. This was ABC's latest answer to the success of Johnny Carson, who celebrated his 10th anniversary in 1972; Joey Bishop and Cavett had already failed, and Paar agreed to return only on condition that Cavett be kept on as one of the rotating segments of Wide World. Didn't matter; Paar only lasted a year, and the entire format disappeared after three years, to be replaced by late-night movies. Oh well, nothing ventured, nothing gained, right?

t  t  t

Not much sports to report; Super Bowl won't be until the following week, so there's no pro football. There are some college all-star games, though: the Senior Bowl and Hula Bowl on Saturday, and the American Bowl on Sunday. The great running back Greg Pruitt played for the South in the Hula Bowl and had a pretty fair NFL career with the Browns and Raiders. Heisman Trophy winner (and Pruitt rival) Johnny Rodgers was in that game as well, for the North side. The Hula Bowl used to be one of the best college all-star games to watch, back when there weren't 200 games a week on television and you didn't get to see the best players all that often.

The golf season returned with the Glen Campbell Los Angeles Open. Back in the day, it was quite fashionable for celebrities to lend their names to golf tournaments: Bing Crosby, Bob Hope, Andy Williams, Dean Martin and Sammy Davis, Jr. were just some of the stars closely identified with tournaments. A sell-out? Perhaps, but I'd rather see the Glen Campbell Los Angeles Open than what it's called now, which I think is the Northern Trust Open, or something like that. By the way, Rod Funseth would win the Campbell this year.

And there's hockey! Two Minnesota North Star games; in Montreal on Monday and Boston on Thursday. We also have dueling hockey leagues, which may seem incredible to those of you who've noticed we only have one major league today, and it can't seem to get its act together. Nevertheless, on Sunday afternoon the new World Hockey Association premieres on CBS as the Winnipeg Jets, with star player/coach Bobby Hull, take on the Minnesota Fighting Saints. Later that afternoon the NHL returns on NBC, with the Boston Bruins travelling to Chicago to face off against the Black Hawks. I remember that Bruins-Hawks game; Chicago, then as now, was my favorite team, and they held on to beat the Bruins in a thrilling game, 5-4.

In non-sports news, it's interesting to see how many genre shows are still on: Bonanza and Gunsmoke, while on their last legs, continue to represent Westerns; the non-procedural police shows, Ironside, The Rookies, Hawaii Five-O, The FBI and Adam-12 are among the biggest. There are still a ton of comedy/variety shows: Julie Andrews, Dean Martin, Carol Burnett, Sonny and Cher and Laugh-In. Carol was part of CBS's epic Saturday night lineup, which also included All in the Family, Mary Tyler Moore and Bob Newhart. And there were medical dramas, Marcus Welby and Medical Center. An interesting collection of shows, don't you think?

t  t  t 

Finally, there's almost always one of these in every issue of TV Guide. I like to refer to it as plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose, partly because I can't speak French and this makes me look smart, but mostly because it's true: the more things change, the more they stay the same. This week it's the January 6 episode of The David Susskind Show, appearing on the PBS station, Channel 2. The topic: "Arabs and Israelis Confront Each Other." The show presents "a candid discussion with Arab and Israeli graduate students in the U.S." Among the issues up for discussion are "terrorism, Palestinian refugees and possible solutions to the Middle East conflict."

Plus ça change, n'est-ce pas? TV  

January 3, 2013

Around the dial

You might have noticed the icon on the sidebar touting the Classic TV Blog Association.  This is a small but growing collection of bloggers committed to educating the public on classic television.  For all of us, classic television is a labor of love.  Each of us has a particular specialty or area of interest we look at; taken together, we offer our readers a unique and, we hope, fascinating look at a history that becomes more distant by the day.  We're dedicated to keeping that history alive, and sharing the pleasure we derive from it. 

Each week I'll be taking a look at the latest from the membership, along with great items from other bloggers.  If you're a regular reader of It's About TV!, I hope you'll check these out as well!  This week:

  • Hal at The Horn Section provides a remembrance of Jack Klugman, the great TV star.  I was never a big fan of Quincy, but I always enjoyed The Odd Couple when it was on first-run.  Last night, unable to sleep because of a cold, I turned over in time to see an episode where Felix, bedridden by a cold, threatens to ruin Oscar's romantic weekend.  However, as soon as I saw Felix looking and sounding as bad as I did, I decided it was cutting too close to the bone.
  • I'm currently reading a TV Guide profile of Art Carney in preparation for an upcoming "This week in TV Guide" feature, so I found Aurora's piece at How Sweet It Was on The Art of Art Carney to be particularly timely.  I always enjoyed Carney's work in "The Honeymooners" sketches; he was one of the great straight men, but his Oscar for Best Actor in Harry and Tonto showed how talented he really was.
  • Can't get enough of the Andy Griffith Show?  Check out Mayberry Mondays at Thrilling Days of Yesteryear, where each week Ivan takes an in-depth look at the comings and goings in North Carolina's most famous city.  Currently he's making his way through the Griffith sequel Mayberry R.F.D., and after that it will be The Doris Day Show.
  • Whether he's writing about classic TV or movies, Rick at Classic Film and TV Cafe always has something worth reading.  Here's a link to his top ten posts of 2012 - they all make for fascinating reading, and you'll want to make this part of your regular routine.
  • How many of you remember cigarette advertising on TV?  Over the weekend I was delving into my DVD collection for some classic New Year's Day bowl games, and it's always interesting to see those commercials from the 60s and early 70s.  Michael, of Michael's TV Tray, notes that it was 42 years ago yesterday that the TV advertising ban went into effect.  Why January 2 and not January 1?  Because tobacco companies were sponsoring bowl games, of course!
  • I don't speak Spanish - yet - but the Spanish-language blog RetroEscuadron makes me want to learn right now.  Here's a look back at Farrah Fawcett's sci-fi suspense film Saturn 3 - also known, IIRC, as the one where Farrah dropped her top.  With those points of interest, plus Kirk Douglas and Harvey Keitel, and directed by Stanley Donan, it should have been a much better movie than it was,
  • Damn you, Kliph Nesteroff!  Do you have any idea how much time I've lost by checking out your blog?  I'll be surfing for information on a piece I'm writing, run across his Classic Television Showbiz site, and the next thing I know it's three hours later and I still haven't written a word!  Kliph has an amazing collection of interviews with great entertainers of the past.  This is better than Lays potato chips - I defy you to be able to stop after reading just one of his pieces.  Whenever I'm stuck or on edge and just need to read something, his is always the site I turn to first.

Happy new year, and good reading! TV  

December 31, 2012

Happy New Year!

As a New Year's teaser, I thought I'd end 2012 with this video from the New Year's Eve 1965 broadcast of The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson.

Now, there are a couple of notable things about this clip.  First, it includes the rarely-seen 15-minute opening of the show, from 11:15-11:30pm ET.  See, Tonight originally ran for an hour and 45 minutes, back to the days when local news was usually only 15 minutes.  However, as the Jack Paar era gave way to Carson, and local news organizations matured in their coverage, more and more stations expanded their news to a full half hour.  NBC affiliates either showed Tonight on a delay after the news, or they just skipped the first 15 minutes altogether.

Needless to say, Carson soon tired of having his monologue cut, and from February 1965 on, he refused to do those first 15 minutes, leaving it to Ed McMahon and then-bandleader Skitch Henderson.  So this video offers us with a rare opportunity to see what those 15 minutes were like.  NBC eventually dropped that segment completely, and Tonight cut back to 90 minutes, and eventually to its current 60 minute length.  I would call this unfortunate, except I can't think of anyone who could be interesting enough for 90 minutes anymore.

However, for me the more interesting part of this clip comes just past the 6:00 mark, when we see NBC's schedule for New Year's Day.  And this, I have to say, perfectly encapsulates my memories of January 1.  The morning starts with the Orange Bowl Parade, taped the previous night (the parade, like the game itself, was a nighttime affair; NBC eventually showed the parade live as well), followed by the Tournament of Roses Parade.  And then, my highlight: NBC's Bowl Day Triple-Header, starting with the Sugar Bowl (Missouri over Florida), continued with the Rose Bowl (UCLA shocking #1 Michigan State), and ending under the lights at the Orange Bowl (Alabama dispatching Nebraska).  The triple-header was only made possible by the Orange Bowl's move to prime-time the previous year, and would continue until the Sugar moved to ABC in 1970.  But for me (and a lot of people, I suspect), not having to change the channels all day was a mighty appealing idea.


The games were different back then, as was almost everything else.  This year the national championship doesn't get settled for another week, and the luster of all of the games has been diminished.  I accept this as a fact of life; you can't live in the past forever, no matter how hard you try.  I do feel sorry, though, for those who never experienced those simple pleasures the way we did.

But then, that's what this blog is about.

Happy New Year everyone, and thanks to all of you for making this such a satisfying year.  We'll all meet again next year!