January 7, 2014

Medic, 1955 - the calm before the storm

Last night as we were watching an episode of Richard Boone's mid-50s medical drama Medic, I was struck once again by how much society has changed during the television era, and how helpful TV can be at seeing - if not understanding - those changes.

The episode in question, "A Time to Be Alive," was originally broadcast on January 31, 1955 on NBC. Medic has long been considered one of the first "realistic" medical dramas on television*, and so it's no surprise that this episode would deal with some fairly weighty subjects.  In this case, an 11-year-old hemophiliac boy lies in critical condition in the hospital, as doctors attempt to stop the bleeding from a fall and save his life.  Now, as far as television goes, there's only so much action you can wring out of doctors administering transfusions and hoping that the blood begins to clot, so the focus of the story quickly moves to the boy's family.

*No surprise, since its creator, James E. Moser, went on to create Ben Casey.

His mother blames herself for the boy's condition, since the hemophilia gene is passed through the female, and ever since he was diagnosed with the disease - in the first few weeks of his life - she has awakened every day in fear that something would happen to him.  His father talks of the difficulty of telling a young boy that he can't live the same active life as his classmates, and that he's so fragile you're afraid he might break when you hold him.

But it's the older sister's dilemma that is most interesting.  Contrary to what you might expect from a TV drama, she's not resentful of the attention her little brother gets; she doesn't feel left out or ignored, she loves him and worries about him.  No, there's something else at work here.  We learn that she's engaged to be married, and after witnessing her brother's latest medical crisis, and listening to the anguish it causes her parents, she's terrified that she, too, might pass the gene on to any children she has.  Moreover, she worries that her fiance will no longer want to marry her because of the possibility of giving birth to a hemophiliac.

Fortunately, her young man seems to be level-headed; he tells her that he loves her and wants to spend the rest of his life with her, no matter what the future may bring.  If that means running the risk of having a hemophiliac child, with its attendant burdens and fears, so be it.  That's part of being an adult - to face the world as it is, and to do so together.  Her brother comes through this medical crisis, and despite the uncertain future the family is prepared to move forward, with hopes that a cure for hemophilia will eventually be found.*

*Note: it hasn't yet, though more effective treatments have been developed.


Richard Boone as Dr. Konrad Styner in Medic
I was struck by several things in this episode, and the dramatic contrast they provide to our times.  First is the idea that a marriage without children is somehow incomplete, and thus undesirable.  There's no thought that children are inherently a burden, no suggestion that the young couple wouldn't want to have kids, and a real concern that the man might seek a different mate because of the uncertain future.  To the contemporary ear, the idea that a woman might be less attractive to a man because of this might sound completely foreign, but this episode treats the subject as a completely natural one, worthy of serious discussion.

There's also no talk about birth control, about simply choosing to not have children, and this marks "A Time to Be Alive" as an episode rooted in a very specific point in time.  The Pill is already in development and will be widely available within the decade.  We're only three years away from the Lambeth Conference in which the Anglican church called for "respect for the consciences of married couples who use birth control," and when Pope Paul VI issues Humanae Vitae in 1968, it will upset many who'd assumed the Catholic Church would accept birth control.

This isn't to say that "family planning" was a foreign idea at the time.  Many married couples, especially those just starting out and with limited means, would discuss the best time to start a family, and might well wait for marriage until they were financially able to take on children.  There were forms of "natural" family planning - condoms, the rhythm method, and other forms of birth control were around, and often appeared in popular fiction.  But we're not quite to the sexual revolution just yet. Were this episode to have been made even just a few years later, there would be an entirely different conversation being carried on, likely with completely different sensibilities expressed by the participants - probably on a show like Peyton Place.

The world we see in this episode of Medic shows us how radically the family has changed, as well as our own thoughts and values.  Were we to attempt to replicate that era in a contemporary program, a la Mad Men, it would suffer from our contemporary knowledge, and the inability to filter it out and restore an original context. Likewise, as Andrew Fielding points out in his book The Lucky Strike Papers (review to come shortly!), it is impossible for us to watch an episode like this today and view it through the context of its original setting, and how it was viewed by an audience that hadn't experienced the changes of the last 60 years.

Lacking that ability, to see Medic in the same way as the original viewers did, we are left with an original document, as it were, set within the context of a very different time.  I find something like that priceless, in the same way as the original coverage of the JFK assassination does something for us that no contemporary history can do.  It gives us something - if not complete realism (for we all know that dramas of the 50s and early 60s lacked the freedom to be completely "realistic" in certain areas), then at least something that in context would be accepted as plausible by the viewer, not asking for a suspension of disbelief.  And in its own way, that tells us much more about what things were like back then - what people thought, what they said, what they did.

It's one of the many reasons I appreciate classic television as a window to our world.  To a self-styled "cultural archaeologist," programs like these become artifacts which, when studied from the perspective of their "native habitats," provide us with a mirror of the times that may not have been ours and never will be, but which must be understood nonetheless.

January 4, 2014

This week in TV Guide: January 5, 1974

After spending a few weeks in 1963, we're skipping ahead by 10 years, taking a look at what's happening in January 1974.

In general, issues from the 70s aren't my favorites; this might be strange considering I subscribed to TV Guide throughout the 70s and therefore should have more of them than I do for any other decade. In addition, I was alive and watching television for the entire decade, which means in theory I could have seen any or all of the episodes in any of these issues.

But in truth, as I've mentioned before, the 70s issues leave me unimpressed.  The typeset is minimal and unappealing; the ads are cluttered and lack the simplistic charm of earlier editions, the programs themselves have moved on from the days of live drama and experimental programming.  In short, TV Guide - like television itself - is older, more mature, more polished - and, as is so often the case, less interesting.

There's another, more personal, reason for my dislike of the decade, however, and that's because I spent so much of it in the worst place on earth, where life with only one television station (NBC) meant I was constantly being taunted and mocked with listings for programs I would never see, shows that in the pre-cable, pre-VCR days remained mere rumors to those living out in the hinterlands.  It may be true that small-town life has its advantages, but watching television in those days was definitely not one of them, especially for someone who'd already begun to mainline programming like a milder version of Mike Teavee.

The 70s aren't without their charms, though.  Some of the things in these issues attain mythic status precisely because they were unavailable to me, while others display a genuine quality and feel that seem (to me, at least) unique to that era.  Let's see if we can find some examples, shall we?

Networks have pretty much given up on Saturday night broadcasting nowadays, but that was not the case in the 70s, and CBS' famed Murderers' Row lineup is in full bloom this week: All in the Family at 7pm (CT), followed by M*A*S*H at 7:30, Mary Tyler Moore at 8:00, Bob Newhart at 8:30, and Carol Burnett at 9:00.  Talk about must-see TV; not all of these are personal favorites, but you'd be hard-pressed to find a stronger, more impressive top-to-bottom lineup on any other network at any other time.  And while CBS may own the night, it's not as if NBC's gone completely off the air; the popular Emergency! airs at 7:00, followed at 8:00 by the still-strong Saturday Night at the Movies*, where big-screen blockbusters still carry some cache.  Only ABC is a no-show this week, as is indicated by their choice to air an ABC News Closeup on "The Right to Die," which likely bombed in the ratings but probably was the most significant and telling show of the entire night, far more relevant today than any of the sitcoms and adventure shows that aired opposite it.  (For example, a doctor says that "while families have a right to opt for a death for the ill members of the family, they do not have a right to commit me to carry out their death wishes.")

*This Saturday night's movie was the Charlton Heston football drama Number One, which puzzled me no end when it was broadcast - I just couldn't figure out how the New Orleans Saints could possibly be presented as a championship team.  Just goes to show you what you can accomplish by aiding the filmmakers.

No pro football this week; unbelievably, the conference finals have already taken place (December 30; things were much simpler then), and this is the bye week before next week's Super Bowl.  What fills the gap?  Some defunct college all-star games (the Hula Bowl from Honolulu on ABC, a syndicated broadcast of the American Bowl from Tampa), the return of some old favorites (ABC's Pro Bowlers Tour, NBC's NHL Game of the Week, and the first golf tournament of the year, the Bing Crosby Pro-Am from Pebble Beach) and local movies.  My favorite from the the movie bunch - Channel 5 has Chapter 11 of the Saturday serial The Phantom Creeps (last seen on MST3K), followed by a pre-Peter Gunn Craig Stevens and a pre-Perry Mason William Hopper in The Deadly Mantis.  ("A defrosted monster makes for New York skyscrapers.")

***

SOURCE: HADLEY TV GUIDE COLLECTION
At this point, WTCN, Channel 11, remains the Twin Cities' sole independent station, and it's always interesting to see what kind of programming they have, usually a mix of sports, syndicated original programming, and reruns of recent series.  As 1974 kicks off, you can see a nice variety of Westerns (The Virginian, High Chapparal), adventure (Mission: Inpossible), classics (Perry Mason), sitcoms (I Dream of Jeannie, Mister Ed, The Lucy Show), talk shows (Merv Griffin, seven nights a week), and Minnesota North Stars hockey (the Stars take on Philadelphia Thursday).  You know, that's not a bad lineup.

We haven't entered the strip programming era yet, so the 6:30pm timeslot has far more variety (if not quality) than what we see today.  For example, WCCO, Channel 4, features Let's Make a Deal on Monday, Wild, Wild World of Animals on Tuesday, Laurel and Hardy on Wednesday, Bobby Goldsboro on Thursday (is that his hair, or a helmet he's wearing?), and The Dating Game on Friday.  KSTP, Channel 5, counters with a week of The Bud Grant Show (Vikings football), The New Price Is Right (with Dennis James, not Bob Barker), Hollywood Squares, and two nights of Bowling For Dollars.  Only KMSP, Channel 9, has anything different - four nights of Truth or Consequences, broken up by one night of To Tell The Truth.

***

James Michener's best-seller Hawaii makes its TV debut on CBS Friday night - sort of.  The reason I say that is that you're probably not seeing much of the movie, let alone the story in the book.  Michener's original book ran to nearly a thousand pages; the movie in its theater version had a running time of three hours and nine minutes; but what you're seeing Saturday night has been edited down to two hours (plus thirty minutes for commercials.  At that rate you have to ask "why bother?" although TV Guide's movie critic, Judith Crist (no fan of the theatrical release) says the editing is all for the best. Had this been a few years later, in the post-Rich Man, Poor Man-Roots period, Hawaii likely would have been made as a multi-part miniseries. But for now, enjoy what you can of it.

On the other hand...
I mentioned earlier that there were programs that were uniquely of the era, and one of them is the "prestige" made-for-TV movie, which ABC puts to good use on Monday night with ABC Theatre's presentation of "F. Scott Fitzgerald and 'The Last of the Belles'," starring Richard Chamberlain and Blythe Danner*.  ABC ran several movies of this kind, ones which I only read about but seemed to be quality programs - "Eleanor and Franklin," starring Jane Alexander and Edward Heremann as the Roosevelts, would air a couple of years later, and there would be other movies, such as The Man Without a Country with Cliff Robertson, The Missiles of October with William Devane, and Raymond Burr's turn as John XXIII in A Man Whose Name Was John.  As the miniseries came into its own, ABC would continue with QBVII, Rich Man, Poor Man and Roots.  Since I couldn't see most of these, I have no idea whether or not they were any good, but there was a mystique about them that suggested they might be.  Going back to the mid 60s, ABC - the perennial last-place network - was wont to take dramatic chances, and was more likely to present the kind of creative programming that I remember.  Of course, once they became a player, with hits from Charlie's Angels to The Love Boat to Happy Days, that would change.  But in their own way, these dramas were as inaccessible to me as the shows from the Golden Age that aired before I was born.

*It was a different era for TV Guide as well.  Not only does it feature an article by James Michener about the writing of Hawaii, it also has a piece by Budd Schulberg on F. Scott Fitzgerald.  Back then, TV Guide apparently felt that their readers could actually read.
***

TV's "Second Season" is about to begin, and this means we're bidding a fond (or not-so-fond) farewell to some series that failed to capture the public's imagination.  So it's goodbye to ABC's Griff, Lorne Greene's private detective series, and so long toNBC's Diana, the sitcom that bombed in spite of the presence of Diana Rigg. Temperatures Rising, ABC's medical comedy, has its last show of its present incarnation - it will return later in the year as The New Temperatures Rising, but faces the same old ratings problems.  Farewell to NBC's Faraday and Company, another PI series that failed to make the grade.  And it's the final bell for ABC's long-running school drama Room 222 and its gentle sex comedy, Love, American Style.

But wherever there's a goodbye, there's also a hello, and on Sunday night Masterpiece Theatre debuts a new 13-part comedy-drama called "Upstairs, Downstairs."  60 Minutes returns for another season, although it's in the unappealing time slot of 5pm Sunday afternoons.  Jeanette Nolan's series Dirty Sally, which was introduced on an episode of Gunsmoke, makes its debut on Friday, but you'll have to look quickly - it'll be rubbed out by ABC's The Odd Couple.

***

One of the features of the year's first issue is a look back at the past year as seen on TV, and it's a helpful reminder of just how much happened in 1973.  The Vietnam War ended, for example - like the Gulf War, it must have seemed as if it would never be over.  The POWs came home, and the reunions were all over television.  There was another war between Israel and the Arabs, and this one let to the oil embargo, the start of higher gas prices in the United States, and the beginning of the end of the American auto industry. Nixon and Agnew were sworn in for second terms - but by the end of the year Agnew had resigned, and the Watergate hearings made for regular viewing.

As for the year in television - An American Family was a landmark PBS series, which I wrote about back here. ABC scored with its docudrama production of Pueblo, starring Hal Holbrook, and a presentation of Tennessee Williams' The Glass Menagerie with Katharine Hepburn in her television debut.  William Holden starred in NBC's four-night miniseries The Blue Knight, which was later made into an inferior weekly series with George Kennedy.  The Miami Dolphins completed their undefeated season with a 14-7 victory over the Washington Redskins in the aptly-named "Stupor Bowl," Billie Jean King defeated Bobby Riggs in tennis' "Battle of the Sexes" (which may or may not have been rigged by the mafia), and Secretariat became the first (and perhaps greatest) Triple Crown winner in a quarter-century.

Quite a year, wasn't it?  And come to think of it, this wasn't a bad issue, either. TV  

January 2, 2014

Around the dial - New Year's edition

They say that as you get older, time goes by more quickly, and I'm increasingly inclined to believe this.  It doesn't seem possible that it's 2014, does it?  But before we bid 2013 adieu completely, let's take a look back at some recent stories.

Back in November, TV When I Was Born did a couple of very nice pieces on coverage of the JFK assassination, and I'm not just saying this because Dixon Hayes links to my interview with David Von Pein.  Dixon does a very good job not only summarizing the coverage from that weekend, but understanding the importance - cultural as well as historical - of what happened and how it changed the way we were.  Highly recommended pieces!

One of my favorite newer blogs is the aptly-named Cult TV Blog - but then how could I feel otherwise when it comes to a site that talks about The Prisoner, The Avengers, Danger Man and other great British series from the era.  The first post of this new year is a great summary of one of my favorite Prisoner episodes, "Checkmate."   As anyone who's read my list of top 10 TV shows knows, The Prisoner is one of those shows that's had a big effect on my way of looking at things, and I never get tired of reading new things about it.

Another blog I've had the pleasure to read this last year is Classic Sports TV and Media, which covers two of my favorite things - sports and television.  Jeff ends the year with a look back at a summary of some of his top stories from 2013, and I'm looking forward to reading what the new year has to bring.

As long as we're discussing lists, Television Obscurities presents a dubious one: 2013's new obscurities, the shows from the last year that ran 13 episodes or less.   As you regular readers know, I'm drawn to obscure programs from the past - I wonder how much of their appeal lies in the thrill of the chase?  As someone points out, pretty much all of these programs are readily available on DVD or streaming video - will they be as fondly remembered years from now?

Comfort TV has a pretty interesting take on Marilyn Monroe and Farrah Fawcett as two sides of the same coin.  I'd never really thought about this before in quite this way, but I think David's persuasive in his analysis. Guilty admission: I've never really been all that into Marilyn Monroe.  Don't ask me why; I don't think it means I'm not a normal, red-blooded American male, but she doesn't do that much for me.  Farrah, on the other hand - well, that poster is a bit, uh, hard to ignore, isn't it?  Even today it makes an impression or two. (David's also write - us writers always remember the bad notices more than the good.)

As for that, I'll try to give you more of the good and less of the bad in 2014.  We'll kick it off with another classic TV Guide on Saturday - see you then! TV  

December 31, 2013

Raging against the machine

I'll be making a tangential comment about Duck Dynasty coming up, but I'm not issuing my standard disclaimer about skipping this piece if it doesn't interest you, because this isn't really about Duck Dynasty.  So don't worry.

Instead, we'll start today with an insightful quote from Andrew Fielding's fascinating book The Lucky Strike Papers. (One of the positive aspects to having an appendectomy: being able to catch up on reading.)  I'll take a closer look at Andrew's book after the first of the year (hint: it's not too late to buy a last-minute gift for the TV fan on your Christmas list), but there's a bit from the early part of the book that jumped out, and I think it's a good starting point for today's discussion.  It's a quote from Douglas T. Miller and Marion Nowak's book The Fifties: The Way We Really Were.  They're discussing the appellation "Golden Age" to the early days of TV:

That assessment, even allowing for the rosy hindsight of nostalgia, is moderately true.  Those first years were fairly unique.  This was primarily because TV had a semblance of balance in programming.  The medium broadcast shows for widely disparate tastes, and this wide spectrum of shows appeared during prime time. One could choose opera (like the made-for-TV "Amahl and the Night Visitors"), the fights, live original drama, quality documentaries like the "See It Now" series, Sid Caesar's satire or Milton Berle's hamming, in addition to situation comedies, musical variety shows, news, and adventure shows.

This is not to say, of course, that every program from the 50s and early 60s was golden; I can tell you from first-hand viewing experience that a lot of them weren't.  But I think Miller and Nowak are on to something here.  I've read pieces from Terry Teachout to the Onion's AV Club to Grantland to James Lileks talking about how we're living in (or just concluding) a new "Golden Age" of television, and it's quite possible you can make the case that TV drama, for example, can deal more frankly and more realistically with today's issues than shows of the first Golden Age.  Certainly we see a more realistic depiction of things like violence and sex (though I'll leave it to you as to whether or not that's objectively a good thing), and coverage of sports and breaking news is - at least in some respects - light years ahead of where it was at the outset.

But here's the point - does the term "Golden Age" refer to more than just quality, and specifically quality in a particular genre or type, or must it encompass the whole of television programming, including the variety of programs available to the viewing public?

In lauding the future of television, media figures such as Newton Minow often heralded the potential that lie in the proliferation of cable television stations, which would be able to program for niche audiences.  Classical drama, opera, ballet, symphonic music, truly educational programming - all these were seen as a given in a world that had 50, or 100, or 200 channels.  And at first that was what we saw, too - until it wasn't.  The disappearance of niche networks give the programming pallet a bland uniformity - it's hard to tell TNT from TBS from WGN from USA from Cloo from FX from FXX from Hallmark from Lifetime from OWN from - well, you get the picture.  And don't even get me started on the betrayal of the "cultural" networks such as Bravo and A&E.

Which brings us, however obliquely, to Duck Dynasty.  In going through the various words from pundits and commentors alike, one phrase pops out over and over, in one variation or another: I don't watch TV.  I seldom ever watch the tube.  We haven't watched it for years.

This is invariably said with an attitude, however unintentional it might be, of smug superiority.  I'm too good, too smart, too moral, to watch television.  TV is the devil's instrument.  I haven't watched TV in years, don't even own a television, there's nothing on anyway.  You get the idea.  People think television is bad for you, and watching it is a waste of time.  I hear this attitude a lot, and every time I do it makes me want to wretch.

For one thing, television is morally neutral.  It's an instrument of transmission, neither good nor evil. It can be used to watch programs that are good for you, or bad.  It can broadcast programs that are full of truth, or made up of lies.  But all that is the fault, or the credit, of those in charge of programming, and the viewers in charge of selecting what to watch.  The television itself has nothing to do with it.

We've covered this territory before, and there really isn't much more to add to it.  As you probably have gathered, I watch a lot of television.  I love watching television - have ever since I was a kid. It hasn't made me stupid, stunted my curiosity, made me antisocial, or turned me into a chubby couch potato.* But, in fact, I Indeed, I probably learned more about American history from watching Alistair Cooke's America than I did in school.  It was watching how television told stories that made me want to create; even though my storytelling is in a different media, I think there's something absolutely visual about the way I write, and I owe that to television. The ability to watch events happening halfway across the planet, or in outer space; the improvement in quality from a fuzzy black and white to stunning HD color, this is truly a marvel.  To be able to plug in a cord and watch streaming video from my laptop - that's incredible.  Even though television has existed for the entirety of my lifetime, I'm still impressed by that fact.

*Well, there may be some truth to the last one.

Of all the criticisms of television, the only one I really have any sympathy for is the argument that there's nothing on worth watching.  A reader of the blog (and a television blogger himself) remarked that the irony for him is that he doesn't even own a TV; everything he watches is on DVD.  I know what he means, because that's true for so much of what we watch as well, albeit with at 40 inch flatscreen HD rather than a computer monitor.  But it's true that there aren't many current programs that I watch regularly - Top Gear, Doctor Who, sports, news, a couple other things.  Most of what I watch comes from my vast media holdings and streaming video.  I think people like us are reinforcing the opinion of Miller and Nowack - there's nothing good on TV, there's no variety in the programming, there's more on than ever before and less worth watching.

But if you're one of those television critics that doesn't see anything good about TV, even DVDs of shows from long ago - you can continue to be smug, you can continue to believe that by cutting yourself off from the outside world your own world is better off for it. I think there's a better way to deal with it: if you think what's on is garbage, don't give in - get your own programming.  You can build good, educational, family entertainment around it.  You can make your own Golden Age of Television.  Operas, Broadway plays, documentaries, family programs, award-winning movies, dramas that reinforce commonly held values - they're all available out there. A discerning viewer could literally spend years watching pre-recorded programming without once having to watch anything on the cable or broadcast networks.  Hell, the only reason we still have cable is for the sports and breaking news we can't get otherwise.  And I think it's only a matter of time, a few years perhaps, when even that will be available through other means.

Don't rage against the machine - instead, as the poet says, Rage, rage against the dying of the light.   You can make television better by making it your own.  You can turn it into a medium that teaches, entertains, informs.  You can do it - but you can't if all you're going to do is withdraw.

What do you think?  Am I reading Miller and Nowack correctly?  Is it true that "Golden Age" refers to the variety of programming as well as the quality?  Or is there more to it even than that?

December 30, 2013

The day in TV: January 1, 1964

You have to think that people are hoping January 1, 1964 signals a beginning to a better year. In fact, I think 1963 was for most a harbinger of bad things to come. By 1968 there will have been more high-profile assassinations, more deaths in Vietnam, more violence at home and abroad. The national culture will be virtually unrecognizable from what it is on this day.   And yet, even though it's only been 39 days since the death of JFK, this week's cover wants to put us in a mood to celebrate.  So let's forget what we know about the future, and look at the first full day of 1964.

KTCA, Channel 2 (Educ.)
Afternoon
05:30p   Kindergarten
Evening
06:00p   To Be Announced
06:30p   General Science
07:00p   Inquiry
07:30p   Inquiring Mind
08:00p   Conversational Spanish
08:30p   Carleton College
09:00p   See the West (debut)
09:30p   Word Power (debut)
10:00p   Profile
10:30p   To Be Announced

Good to see KTCA's sticking with its educational programming, and even introducing some new shows!  By contrast, I think this New Year's most PBS stations will be broadcasting the New Year's Gala from Vienna.

WCCO, Channel 4 (CBS)
Morning

07:00a   Siegfried, Axel, Clancy
08:00a   Captain Kangaroo
09:00a   News (local)
09:15a   What’s New
09:25a   Dr. Reuben K. Youngdahl
09:30a   I Love Lucy
10:00a   Cotton Bowl Parade (special)
10:45a   Tournament of Roses (special) (color)
Afternoon
12:45p   Cotton Bowl – Navy vs. Texas (special)
03:30p   Best of Groucho
04:00p   Around the Town
04:30p   Axel and Deputy Dawg
05:00p   Clancy and Company
05:30p   CBS News (Walter Cronkite)
Evening
06:00p   News (local)
06:15p   Sports (local)
06:20p   Spotlight
06:25p   Weather (local)
06:30p   Years of Crisis (special)
07:30p   Tell It to the Camera
08:00p   The Beverly Hillbillies
08:30p   Dick Van Dyke
09:00p   Danny Kaye
10:00p   News (local)
10:15p   Weather (local)
10:20p   Sports (local)
10:30p   Steve Allen (Steve and Jayne interviews at opening of “The Cardinal”)
12:00a   Movie – “It! The Terror from Beyond Space”
12:30a   News (local) (time approximate)

Kind of sad to see reference to the Cotton Bowl parade here.  For many years that was a warm-up to the network's coverage of the Rose parade.  Whether or not it's true, the story I'd always heard was that when the Cotton Bowl game moved from CBS to NBC for a short-lived alliance in the 90s, the network declined to pick up the parade as well - they didn't need it to fill out their programming.  Without a network home, the parade itself folded.  A brief revival a few years ago didn't take.  Chris Schenkel and Pat Summerall call the parade, and will be part of CBS' coverage of the game later in the day.  The network's announcing team for the Rose parade is lovely Bess Myerson and GE Theater host Ronald Reagan - wonder what ever happened to that guy?

The Cardinal, the opening night of which is being covered on Steve Allen's show, was a big-budget movie spectacle based on the best-selling novel of the same name.  It's actually not a bad story, fairly sympathetic to the Catholic Church and the people involved with it.  Tom Tryon, who starred, went on to a bigger career as a novelist.  The great director John Huston did not direct The Cardinal (Otto Preminger did), but instead did a rare acting turn in a small supporting role, and was good enough to snag a Best Supporting Actor nomination,

KSTP, Channel 5 (NBC)
Morning

06:30a   Film Feature
07:00a   Today (Tennessee Williams, Judith Crist, Richard Watts, Maurice Dolbeir, McHenry Boatwright)
09:00a   Say When
09:25a   NBC News (Edwin Newman)
09:30a   Word for Word (color)
10:00a   Concentration
10:30a   Rose Parade (special) (color)
Afternoon
12:45p   Sugar Bowl – Alabama vs. Mississippi (special) (color)
03:45p   Rose Bowl – Illinois vs. Washington (special) (color)
Evening
06:30p   The Virginian (color)
08:00p   Espionage
09:00p   The Eleventh Hour
10:00p   News (local) (color)
10:15p   Weather (local) (color)
10:20p   Sports (local) (color)
10:30p   Johnny Carson (Corbett Mnoica, Sam Levenson, Anna Moffo, Ken Carson)
12:00a   News and Sports (local) (color)

No, I'm not sure why Channel 4 lists the "Tournament of Roses" while Channel 5 has "Rose Parade."  To make things more confusing, the ad for NBC's coverage calls it the "Tournament of Roses Parade."  Oh well.  The ad also promises "Well-Known Surprise Guests," which - according to the listing on the opposite page - include James Franciscus, Bill Dana, Abby Dalton and Whitney Blake - NBC stars all.  There goes the surprise, I guess.  NBC's hosts are Arthur Godfrey and Betty White - Betty a real parade expert,as she's also host of the Macy's Thanksgiving Parade (with Lorne Greene) from 1962-1971.

Quick story about The Eleventh Hour, a psychiatric medical drama that aired for a couple of seasons.  Just as NBC and ABC had competing doctor shows - Dr. Kildare and Ben Casey - they also had competing psychiatrist shows spun off from those hit series.  NBC had The Eleventh Hour, while ABC countered with Breaking Point.  Wendell Corey was the original star of Eleventh Hour, but was replaced for the second season by Ralph Bellamy - who admitted that the show was on too late in the night for he and his wife to watch.  They generally watched Breaking Point instead.

KMSP, Channel 9 (Ind.)
Morning

07:40a   Chapel of the Air
07:45a   Breakfast With Grandpa Ken
09:00a   Romper Room (Miss Betty)
09:55a   ABC News (Lois Leppart)
10:00a   The Price is Right
10:30a   Object Is
11:00a   Mummers Parade (special) (color)
Afternoon
12:30p   Orange Bowl – Auburn vs. Nebraska (special)
03:30p   Trailmaster (joined in progress)
04:00p   Adventures in Paradise
05:00p   News (local)
05:15p   ABC News (Ron Cochran)
05:30p   Leave It to Beaver
Evening
06:00p   The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis
06:30p   The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet
07:00p   Patty Duke
07:30p   The Farmer’s Daughter
08:00p   Ben Casey
09:00p   Channing
10:00p   News, Weather, Sports (local)
10:30p   Robert Taylor’s Detectives
11:30p   Target: Corrupters
12:30a   News (local)
12:35a   Sen. Eugene McCarthy

ABC carried the Rose parade from time to time, but not this year.  You can find some clips of the Auburn-Nebraska Orange Bowl game on YouTube.  It's the last time the game will be played during the day; next year it will become the first prime-time bowl game, and in the process moves from ABC to NBC.  That gives NBC the murderer's row of bowl games that I remember so well from my own youth - the Sugar, Rose and Orange.  It lasts until ABC spirits away the Sugar in 1970.  Now, of course, all these games are on ESPN - along with about 30 other games.

Channing, also known as The Young and the Bold, sounds as if it belongs during the daytime, doesn't it?  It's a drama set at a fictional Channing college, and only ran one season.  The supporting cast was pretty good - I mean, how bad can a series be if it has Suzanne Pleshette as a co-ed?  Leslie Nielsen, Keir Dullea, Marion Ross, Dawn Wells, Joey Heatherton and Leo G. Carroll were also listed as regulars, and it's not a good sign when your entire cast is better known for other shows they appeared in.

WTCN, Channel 11 (ABC)
Morning

10:45a   Kukla and Ollie
11:00a   En France
11:30a   Dateline: Minnesota
11:55a   Tricks for Treats
Afternoon
12:00p   Lunch With Casey
01:00p   Movie – “The Travelling Saleswoman”
02:45p   Lee Phillip
03:00p   December Bride
03:30p   Robin Hood
04:00p   Beetle and Pete
04:30p   Mickey Mouse Club
05:00p   Superman
05:30p   The Lone Ranger
Evening
06:00p   Whirlybirds
06:30p   Bold Journey
07:00p   Expedition!
07:30p   Stoney Burke
08:30p   Desilu Playhouse
09:30p   News (local)
09:45p   Weather (local)
09:50p   Sports (local)
10:00p   Movie – “The Desert Song”
12:15a   Burns and Allen

Stoney Burke hadn't been off the air that long before it was picked up in syndication by WTCN.  That happened with a number of their shows over the years - Run For Your Life, The Invaders and such.  I suppose it made sense to get them on the air while people still remembered them.  On the other hand, Burns and Allen had been around forever.

I mentioned a while back that RadioDiscussions.com, which had a terrific classic TV message board, had gone belly-up.  The good news is that it's been replaced by a new board, Radio Insight Community - I'm now posting this feature over there each week, and there are a lot of other good topics being discussed as well.  It's well worth a trip to check it out!