Showing posts with label Game Shows. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Game Shows. Show all posts

May 23, 2026

This week in TV Guide: May 22, 1965



From time to time, TV Guide has presented an occasional series of articles called "If I had a network, in which prominent personages from various walks of life are asked the simple question, "What would you do if you were in complete charge of a network?" This week, the respondent is one of the magazine's most distinguished occasional essayists, British humorist and critic Malcolm Muggeridge. Now, that name should be familiar to you as a regular reader of this website, because I almost always feature Muggeridge's pieces when they appear. They're invariably shrewd, erudite, and witty, not to mention extremely perceptive. So what does Mr. M have to say about running an American television network?

For starters, his first step would be "a furious, sustained and lethally well-documented assault on Nielsen ratings, with a view to undermining their acceptance," to be replaced by what he calls a "system of enquiry into viewing, both qualitative and quantitative, undertaken by, say, the sociology department of Columbia University." Such a study would, he believes, provide a far more accurate analysis of American viewing habits, although it would meet with stiff opposition from advertising agencies, "who naturally prefer existing arrangements, in the same sort of way that African witch doctors prefer toads and newts to logarithms." 

Thus empowered, what would he have appear on our screens? Surprisingly enough, he says, "the word 'culture' would play no part in my plans." A television network, he goes on to say, "should be thought of not in terms of a theater or music hall; not, certainly, of a lecture hall or classroom, but of what was known, in the lower-middle-class homes I frequented when I was young, as an evening 'social,'" consisting of games, discussions, an analysis of the news, perhaps a reading—a salon of sorts, you might say. 

Part of that would be comedy; in the first half-century of cinema, "only in the genre of comedy was anything of enduring interest achieved." And it would be comedy of a higher sort than one often sees on the home screens today; rather than old, warmed-over jokes from tired gag writers, he would feature "warm, rich, authentic comedy, derived from life rather than from the dreary standard techniques of entertainment." He then goes on to make a remarkable statement, one that rings richly true today, and serves as a sad indictment of our modern culture: "It is to me always an extraordinary circumstance that Americans, who in their private capacity love to laugh more perhaps than any other people, in their public capacity so easily become preternaturally solemn." For suggestions, advice, and (hopefully) performances, he would instruct his secretary to immediately reach out to the one and only Zero Mostel, and would aim for comedy that comes from the fortunes and misfortunes of daily life, its joys and delights, in much the same way he did in Fiddler on the Roof or the way it's done on the British sitcom Steptoe and Son (which, indeed, did work in this country, as Sanford and Son). 

Next, he'd take Fred Friendly and put him in complete and total charge of the news and public affairs department, with the lure that all his programs would be shown in prime time. He would have only two directives: "firstly, to go for comment, the harder and the more vehement the better; and, secondly, to leave news stories as such to the news agencies, as sensible newspapers do, devoting all available camera resources to elucidating the meaning or significance of what is happening in the world." In other words, don't go for the stories all the other networks are covering; go where they aren't. As he says, "After 40 years of journalism I propound this truth—the news is never where it is but always where it isn’t."

As far as the commentary that he mentioned, here he makes another prescient observation that applies one hundred percent to our time: "do Americans, I often wonder, realize how completely their television reflects (to use the latest jargon-word) a consensus rather than the tangle of individual, rasping, conflicting views which characterize a truly free and open society?" What television is particularly good at is presenting what he calls "the false sense of unanimity," whereas he wants to see a diversity of opinion—not the free-for-all shoutfest that news networks give us today, but different voices, with different opinions. Wouldn't that be nice?

Finally, "I should try to make my network intensely American." He knows this sounds funny coming from a foreigner, but he also notes that in all the years he's come and gone to America, "I have been haunted by a sense that in the public presentation of the people, and the country, both at home and abroad, something quite delightful, and to me intensely sympathetic, gets left out." It is, he writes, "Something joyous, innocent, humorous; exactly contrary to the gangster violence, the sick sex obsessions, the portentous moralizing, which so often, alas, pass for being American." For example, why not serialize Huckleberry Finn or Tom Sawyer, rather than Peyton Place? The American culture, he seems to say, the American persona, is a unique thing that deserves to be celebrated, not ignored. 

To this, I should think, we could all say, "Amen." 

l  l  l

During the 60s, The Ed Sullivan Show and The Hollywood Palace were the premier variety shows on television. Whenever they appear in TV Guide together, we'll match them up and see who comes out on top.

Sullivan:  Scheduled guests: Pernell Roberts of Bonanza; Liza Minnelli, currently starring in Broadway’s "Flora the Red Menace"; Guy Lombardo and his Royal Canadians; singer Kathy Kirby; comedian Bob King; juggler Eric Badicton; comics Stiller and Meara; the Bachelors, Irish folk singers; and the Feredianis, acrobats. (According to the episode guide, ballet stars Rudolf Nureyev & Margot Fonteyn appeared as well.)

Palace:  Host Tennessee Ernie Ford introduces singer/dancer Ann Miller, who dances on stage with a partner for the first time (Dante de Paulo); songstress Edie Adams; comedian Jack Carter; Santos, Portuguese acrobat who performs somersaults on the low wire; the O'Keefe comedy divers from England, one of whom dives 90 feet into six and one-half feet of water; and the Gus Augspurg Monkeys.

To be perfectly honest, this is a bit of a struggle. I'm not really all that into listening to Pernell Roberts sing cowboy ballads, and both shows have their share of acrobats. Ed has Stiller and Meara, the Palace has Jack Carter. Ed has Liza, Z or not; the Palace has Edie Adams. But there's Tennessee Ernie and Ann Miller, a powerhouse duo, and based on that, I'm giving a slight edge to the Palace.

l  l  l

From 1963 to 1976, TV Guide's weekly reviews were written by the witty and acerbic Cleveland Amory. Whenever they appear, we'll look at Cleve's latest take on the shows of the era.

This week, Cleveland Amory ventures into the world of the celebrity game show with a show entitled, appropriately enough, The Celebrity Game. It is, someone once wrote, a kind of precursor to The Hollywood Squares, in that we have a panel of celebrities, and three contestants who try to predict how the celebrities answered various questions. The answers are, of course, simply excuses for various comic riffs and punchlines: for example, "Do you agree that the first thing most men notice about women is their eyes? When women talk, do men really listen? Does a woman worry more about being single than a man? Is it possible to predict what kind of wife a woman will make? Is it wise for a man to try to win every argument with his wife?" If, Cleve opines, "for some unaccountable reason you want to know the answers to the above questions and furthermore want to have humorous answers delivered by celebrities," then this is your cup of tea—or, perhaps, something a little stronger, which you'll need just to sit down and watch. 

Host of The Celebrity Game is Carl Reiner, who says that it's a challenge to get many of these celebrities, many of whom "are really shy and retiring by nature," to open up and participate. Were this truly so, Amory observes, "either Mr. Reiner has entirely confined himself to the outgoing type or he is the greatest master of ceremonies since Louis XIV. If his celebrities participated any more, there would be no need for Mr. Reiner at all." The celebrities run the typical gamut, with George Jessel, Della Reese, Phyllis Diller, Morey Amsterdam, Frankie Avalon, and "several Gabors." Whether the celebrities are giving spontaneous answers to these questions or are depending on their writers, Amory doesn't venture an opinion. However, it remains true that the humor is uneven at best, and sometimes downright unfunny. 

Speaking of those questions, you'll notice that most of them have to do with the war between the sexes, which was already tiresome long before 1965. However, given that Dr. Joyce Brothers is billed as a consultant, you can also count on questions of a medical nature, such as "Are we becoming a nation of hypochondriacs by watching too many hospital shows on television?" (The 2026 version of this question would undoubtedly substitute pharmaceutical commercials for doctor shows.) The best answer he can remember, Cleve says, was also the most appropriate, coming from Tommy Sands, who prefaced his answer with "I’m not going to try to be cute or funny, because I’m not cute or funny." And that, Amory says, is that.

l  l  l

To be perfectly honest, I've never thought of Max Baer as the next Angry Young Man, but according to this unbylined profile, there's "a lot of hostility" that's built up inside him, and that comes out on the set occasionally. Not aimed at others, it should be noted; Baer is far too self-aware to consider himself a big enough star to be temperamental. His demands for perfection are aimed mostly at himself, and his frustrations at being trapped in a role that clearly doesn't align with who Max Baer—son of the former world heavyweight boxing champion, well-read graduate of the University of Santa Clara (major in commerce, minor in philosophy), who enjoys discussing Kant and Spinoza and Schopenhauer
—really is.

 "What really bugs me is I'm out in public and some guy looks me over and says, 'So you're Jethro, huh? Well, you’re not so big.' They’re the same kind of people who used to say, 'So you’re Max Baer’s kid, huh? Well, you don’t look so tough.' I'm playing a caricature—a mental midget—and I’m no more like Jethro than the man in the moon." 

Ah, the price of fame.

Acting came naturally to Baer; his father had wanted to be an actor, but was pushed into the fight game by his father, who had wanted to be a boxer himself. "I wanted to be an engineer or lawyer and got sidetracked," Max Jr, says. "But, as I tell my mother, someday I'll make good in the work that Dad really wanted to do." And though he may bristle about playing Jethro, he's also refreshingly realistic. "I’m not complaining. Sure, Hillbillies isn’t my type of humor, personally. I’d like to move on to bigger things. But I go for this good Hollywood life. The money’s good, the dames are good, even if all the older dames in town want to mother me." And he can be seen taking a real interest in the behind-the-scenes side of Hollywood, studying directors, taking notes, watching the editors in the process of cutting the film. And he hasn't given up on moving on to more challenging work, plays such as "A Streetcar Named Desire." Maybe in another four or five years, he says. Richard Whorf, who directed the first two seasons of Hillbillies, is a believer. "This is a boy who improved 900 percent in two years—and he’s all unschooled, natural ability. Don’t be surprised if Max turns into a very big star."

In fact, that kind of stardom eludes Baer. Unsurprisingly, the many seasons as Jethro left him typecast, and he moved into the production side that he'd taken such an interest in earlier, producing and directing the movies Macon County Line and Ode to Billy Joe, before retiring from the business in 1979. Still and all, Max Baer Jr. lives on as the last surviving member of one of the most successful sitcoms of all time, one for which he'll always be remembered, and there are worse things in life than that.

l  l  l

In looking through the week's movies, we land immediately on KTVU's Unchained (Saturday, 10:30 a.m.), which stars former football star Elroy Hirsch and current Della Street Barbara Hale in the story of Chino State Prison, the "prison without walls." But you don't care about any of that, and you might only be tangentially interested that jazz great Dexter Gordon has an uncredited role in the movie as a saxophone player in the prison jazz band—he was at the time serving a sentence for heroin possession. No, what you're interested in, and what Unchained is primarily known for, is "Unchained Melody," written by Alex North and Hy Zaret, made famous by the Righteous Brothers, and one of the rare B-movie themes to earn an Oscar nomination for Best Song. (It lost to "Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing," which later spawned a soap opera of the same name, but that's another story.)

A couple of Western-themed programs highlight Sunday, beginning with The Saga of Western Man's "Custer to the Little Big Horn" (4:00 p.m., ABC), and the title pretty much tells it all in this story of one of the most controversial figures in American history. I don't know for sure at this point in time if we still considered Custer a hero or a villain, and that's a question that probably never will get a definitive answer. Later that night, it's director John Huston's modern-day Western, The Misfits (9:00 p.m.), with Clark Gable and Marilyn Monroe each making their last film appearances, and Monroe's then-husband, playwright Arthur Miller, writing his only screenplay. 

Hugh Downs and the Today crew are in Greece this week (Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m., NBC), with a look at the ancient and mysterious country; on today's show, they're joined by art and architecture correspondent Ailne Saarinen in looking at the "Golden Age," with a focus on the Acropolis, Parthenon, and Theatre of Dionysus. I wonder if they'll find the version of The Odyssey that Christopher Nolan should have used while they're there. Later, CBS premieres the first of their famous "test" programs, the "National Drivers Test." (10:00 p.m.) It's a timely broadcast, coming four days before Memorial Day; Walter Cronkite and Mike Wallace quiz viewers and respondents in four categories: Judgment, Knowledge, Perception, and Special Situations.

On Tuesday, "Boy Under Glass," a repeat episode of Mr. Novak, spotlights an issue that isn't so much of an issue anymore: the school's star pitcher has a chance to show off for major league scouts in a playoff game, but first the has to remain academically eligible. (7:30 p.m., NBC) You remember academics, don't you? Before lawsuits and image-and-likeness payments and pro days for the cream of the crop, there was actually this quaint notion that young people were students first, and athletes second. Leo Durocher has a cameo appearance as himself. It would be interesting to look at this episode through today's sensibilities and ask a test audience if they actually understood the principles involved.

A Group W Special, Paintings in the White House: A Close-Up (Wednesday, 8:00 p.m., KPIX), highlights the history of art in the White House, including the famous paintings that currently reside in the Mansion. First Lady Lady Bird Johnson introduces the program, which is narrated by Fredric March and Florence Eldridge, and will spawn a companion coffee-table volume. It preempts My Living Doll with Julie Newmar, and you can decide for yourself whether or not that's a good thing. And there's a nice casting touch in The Virginian (7:30 p.m., NBC), a flashback story that explains how Trampas came to the Shiloh Ranch after his father was killed by Judge Garth in self-defense: Sonny Tufts, who played Doug McClure's character in the 1946 movie of the same name, plays his father in this episode.

Back in the day, which in this case is 61 years ago, Memorial Day was celebrated on May 30, no matter what day of the week that happened to fall on. And the Indianapolis 500 was run on Memorial Day, no matter what day of the week it was. On Thursday night, announcer Sid Collins ("The Voice of the 500") narrates The Greatest Spectacle (10:00 p.m., Channel 10), an hour-long documentary tracing the history of the great race, including interviews with Ray Harroun, the first winner of the 500; legendary war hero Eddie Rickenbacker, who once owned the Speedway; and current president Tony Hulman, known as the man who saved the 500.

"Controlled Experiment," a Friday repeat of The Outer Limits (7:30 p.m., KTVY) is the series' only comedy episode, featuring Barry Morse and Carroll O'Connor as two Martians come to earth to investigate our "quaint custom of murder." As if they wouldn't do the same thing; ask Roddy McDowall in "People Are Alike All Over"! Later, the KXTV movie at 10:00 p.m. is David and Goliath, an Italian movie from 1960 starring Orson Welles, in one of those films I suspect he made for the money to finance a project of his. No truth to the rumor that he plays both title roles. 
 

l  l  l

MST3K alert:
The Sword and the Dragon (Russian; 1960) Bay Area TV Debut. With a magic sword a legendary Russian hero sets out to rescue his wife from barbarians. Boris Andreyev, Andrei Abrikosov, Natalia Medvedeva. (Monday, 5:00 p.m., KGO in San Francisco) The movie itself is nothing to write home about, but the interstitials include what is probably the greatest-ever Ingmar Bergman joke. Granted, that may not be a huge category, but even so, it's a classic.
 TV
If you enjoy the content here and want to support my broader creative work, please consider leaving a tip at my Ko-fi page. Any amount you contribute helps me continue writing, researching, and sharing these articles and projects. Thank you!

April 17, 2026

Around the dial



Wt Cult TV Blog, John's latest look at the 1970s anthology Play for Today focuses on "The Right Prospectus," a challenging drama by noted playwright John Osborne. What kind of commentary might Osborne have been offering here? See for yourself.

In his review of Friday night television in 1977 at Comfort TV, David notes that this was the first night in which there were no top 30 shows for the year on the schedule. Does that mean they were bad shows? Wonder Woman, Rockford, Quincy, Donny & Marie?

At ReMind, Rob Edelstein looks at the worst game shows of all time, and while there are plenty to choose from throughout the years, I don't think you'll disagree that some of these shows are really bad

The Metzingers review the 1974 British teen drama series Soldier and Me at Silver Scenes, and find an unusually literate, gritty series that includes Cold War spies and genuine danger for its young heroes. It's the kind of series Disney would never offer, because of what it doesn't include.

At The View from the Junkyard, Roger's weekly foray into The A-Team takes us to "Cup A' Joe," a contender for the funniest episode of the series, and one that gives us a little more insight into Murdoch's character.

At Drunk TV, Paul takes a look at one of the infamous miniseries of the '70s, Washington: Behind Closed Doors (it helps if you imagine Howard Cosell's voice), a sleazy, over-the-top Watergate-esque story that, as I recall, helped diminish the stature of the miniseries genre.

Cult TV Lounge returns with the 1980s adventure series Tales of the Gold Monkey, a hit show that fell victim to network politics. Good credentials, though: Donald P. Belisario as creator, Stephen Collins as star, and some rollicking good fun. Which is really what it's all about, right? TV
If you enjoy the content here and want to support my broader creative work, please consider leaving a tip at my Ko-fi page. Any amount you contribute helps me continue writing, researching, and sharing these articles and projects. Thank you!

October 18, 2025

This week in TV Guide: October 16, 1965



As anyone who watches television knows, sponsorship is the lifeblood of the medium. Commercials on TV are, by and large, annoying, infuriating, stupid, loud, and wind up telling you very little about the products they're supposedly advertising. There are too many of them, they last too long, and they're so intrusive that they can leave a viewer running for cover just to escape. Even public television has them, although they're not called such. There was a time when a television series couldn't even make it to the airwaves without already having sponsors lined up.  

Which leads us to this week's question: just how do programs go about getting sponsorship? Here to provide the answers, in a very funny article that contains more truth than I suspect we might think, is Robert Leonard. Leonard is a man who should know, having spent ten years as Vice President in Charge of Television at one of Madison Avenue’s biggest ad agencies. It was his job to sell prospective programs to sponsors looking to finance the season's next big thing, which would just so happen to provide the sponsor's product with the best possible platform for exposure to the millions of viewers who, until this very moment, had no idea that said product was so essential to their quality of life. There are, Leonard says, four basic types of pitches known to the industry, one to cover each type of program the agency might encounter; in the right hands, each of these pitches guarantees sure-fire results every time.

The safest kind of program to pitch, according to Leonard, is the "Likewise, I'm sure" kind of show. You know the kind: a show that"carbon-copies some other well-rated program as closely as the laws of infringement permit." Imagine, if you will, a show starring "an outspoken housemaid." You can't call it Hazel, of course, but what about Ethel? It's the perfect response for the sponsor who demands something on the order of, say, Bonanza. "You might come right back at him with a drama called Briganza that takes place on a big Oregon ranch called The Sequoia, which is owned by Bill Wheelwright who has four sons. ('A real switcheroo, eh, Harry?')" I'm sure we've all seen an example or two of this kind of program over the years, haven't we, Dick Wolf? 

Speaking of whom, the second kind of show, Leonard says, is the one with the sterling "credit rating." This is something everyone who watches television today ought to be familiar with; Dick Wolf has made a career out of selling concepts based on the simple fact that they were created by one Dick Wolf. You can, in fact, make this kind of pitch all the way down the line, "through scriptwriters, film editor and wardrobe mistress." With this kind of credit in the bank, you can push for extra star power in the casting, in something called a "fresh format." Think of "something like combining Willie Mays and Chet. Huntley in a psychological Western, or Lawrence Spivak playing the role of a kindly football coach." Why, the pitch practically writes itself: "Believe me, Louie, the rating services will Top-10 this baby! It’s got everything going for it!"

Then, there's something called "integrated programming." In this kind of program, the commercial is practically a part of the show; imagine, Leonard proposes, a series called D.S.C., featuring the brave men of the "Department of Street Cleaning." Sounds exciting, right? Well, maybe not to you or me, but what if you were in charge of ad buying for a company famous for its detergent products. See where we're going here? Each week, "exciting episode after episode takes us into the everyday lives of the men who preserve our sanitation; their hopes and fears, their home life; the things they have inside their homes that they’ve collected in line of duty." All brought to you by the company that makes their uniforms sparkle! 

What if, however, your program lacks that certain je ne sais quoi? The kind of show that "Doesn’t aim very high, so it can’t fall very far." It's still on the market, even though it's been on the air for a few weeks. "The network is desperate. The packager is frantic. The price is slashed! And the concessions you get! Quick-escape clauses! Extra commercial positions!" Sounds good—but, you might be wondering, why hasn't someone bought it up yet? "Maybe it's a real stinker. Maybe everyone who saw the pilot threw up." In that case, it's not that the's show's bad; it's just offbeat, not for everyone, victim of a bad timeslot. Don't look at it as a bad show; think of it as a good bargain.
 
And so there you have it, the concise explanation for how your favorite (or least-favorite) show got its sponsor. There's only one last detail remaining: the Return on Investment, here expressed as the CPM: cost per thousand homes per minute of commercial. You arrive at this by taking the weekly average audience from last season, and add 25 percent "to prove you have confidence in the new vehicle you picked." Divide that by the sponsor's cost per episode, and then again by the number of commercial minutes per episode. And that is your magic number, the one that enables you to close the deal. However, Leonard offers this warning in conclusion: "Don’t dare put the CPM in writing. Because when your television turkey is staggering around next spring just asking to be slaughtered, the CPM can get your neck, too."

l  l  l

During the 60s, the Ed Sullivan Show and The Hollywood Palace were the premiere variety shows on television. Whenever they appear in TV Guide together, we'll match them up and see who has the best lineup..

Sullivan: In Hollywood, Ed's scheduled guests are Sid Caesar; actor Sean Connery; the singing McGuire Sisters; singer Pat Boone; the rock 'n' rolling Animals; comics Guy Marks and Totie Fields; and the Fiji Military Band. (Note that according to the episode guide, Connery was a no-show, while Caesar was joined by Joyce Jameson (who also sings) in a sketch, and musical group Sam the Sham and the Pharaohs and tumbling group The Gimma Brothers also appeared.)

Palace: Host Frank Sinatra welcomes Count Basie; comic Jack E. Leonard; dancer Peter Gennaro, choreographer for Perry Como and the recent Andy Griffith special; West German singer-dancers Alice and Ellen Kessler; and Colombian high-wire acrobat Murillo.

What I enjoy about this week's matchup is that it shows off the extremes of my own musical tastes: The Animals (singing "The Work Song") and Pat Boone ("Night and Day" among other selections) on Sullivan, and Frank Sinatra and Count Basie on the Palace. And despite the temptation to push it, I'm going for The Palace, but in this pre-DVD era watch for Sullivan on reruns.

l  l  l

From 1963 to 1976, TV Guide's weekly reviews were written by the witty and acerbic Cleveland Amory. Whenever they appear, we'll look at Cleve's latest take on the shows of the era

This week Cleveland Amory demonstrates that there was, in fact, such a thing as life before Columbo for Peter Falk. Falk, of course, knew this well; prior to donning the lieutenant's rumpled raincoat, he'd received two Academy Award nominations for Best Supporting Actor, won an Emmy for "The Price of Tomatoes," and had starred in the subject of this week's review, a series which he's called his favorite, Trials of O'Brien. And Cleve has some news for you: "If you think that Peter Falk is an overrated young man who looks like the late John Garfield and acts like a road-company James Cagney—and that, furthermore, he is inclined to make a federal case out of saying 'hello' and yet plays a big scene as if it should have been handled in small-claims court—then you are not going to like this show." On the other hand, if you think he is the coolest, hippest, In-est actor to come along since The Birth of a Nation, then you are going to love it. For, make no mistake about it, this is Falk’s show."

And what this is is a legal drama laced with a liberal dose of comedy; in fact, it might not be a stretch to view Danny O'Brien, Falk's character, as a distant relative of Columbo, one of those familial characters that keep popping up in the stories the lieutenant tells suspects as he's luring them into his trap. He is, as the American Bar Association disparingly described him in a complaint to CBS, a man who "(1) plays the horses, (2) parks his car in a no-parking zone, (3) throws his brief case, crammed with important papers, into the back of his open convertible and (4) is divorced and, apparently worst of all, is behind on his alimony payments." In addition, they don't like his habits, manners, and dress. All of this, the ABA claims, combines to bring the legal profession into disrepute and suspicion. (As if they weren't capable of that on their own.)

To all this, Amory replies, the network should "throw the American Bar Association out of court." Yes, make him pay his parking fines, but the back alimony points to one of the strongest parts of the series, O'Brien's relationship with his ex-wife Katie, played by Joanna Barnes, whom Amory calls "the brightest new spot of the new season." "[E]ven if the writers make her act mean, she doesn’t really mean to be mean—she’s not all on the side of the Bar Association." Falk, in fact, is surrounded by a strong supporting cast; in addition to Barnes, there's Elaine Stritch, Ilka Chase, and David Burns, and guest-starring appearances by Herschel Bernardi, Robert Blake, Buddy Hackett and Cloris Leachman. But, as will be the case with Columbo, the center of gravity at all times is Falk, who is on screen 90 percent of the time and can "tough-guy it and hard-heart it with anybody but the Supreme Court." And the network itself; despite a positive reception (even from critics not named Cleveland Amory), the series ends after a run of 22 episodes.

l  l  l

For political junkies, the Sunday interview shows are a feast. With the death of President Kennedy last year, former President Dwight Eisenhower is seen even more as the elder statesman of the presidency (along with Harry Truman, to a lesser extent), and on Issues and Answers (1:30 p.m., ABC), he sits down for a one-on-one interview with White House correspondent Bill Lawrence from the Civil War battlefield at Gettysburg. General Eisenhower* analyzes military tactics in the Vietnam War, discusses the final volume in his memoirs, and talks politics, including "a plan for limiting Senate and Congressional terms of office." Ah, Ike always was a man ahead of his time.

*As a five-star general, Eisenhower was given the choice as to what title he wished to use following his presidency. He always chose to be referred to as "General" rather than "President."

From left: Beame, Lindsay, Buckley
Meanwhile, Meet the Press (4:30 p.m., NBC) interviews the three major candidates for mayor of New York City: Republican John Lindsay, Democrat Abe Beame, and Conservative William F. Buckley, Jr. Buckley's stated reason for entering the race is an attempt to deny victory to the liberal Lindsay (indeed, Beame may well be less liberal than Lindsay), and although he fails (Lindsay wins with 43% to Beame's 39% and Buckley's 13%), WFB does get off the best line of the campaign: declining his rebuttal time during a debate, he remarks that "I am satisfied to sit back and contemplate my own former eloquence."* Would that there was even one candidate of this caliber running today.

*I've used this line many times over the years myself. Although there are those who would have preferred I stop with "I am satisfied to sit back."

There's no guest listed for Face the Nation (9:30 a.m., CBS), but a quick Google search reveals that it was Alabama Attorney General Richmond Flowers, who's there to discuss the trial of KKK member Collie Leroy Wilkins for the murder of civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo following the march from Montgomery to Selma. Wilkins' first trial ended in a hung jury, and the moderate Flowers, a proponent of civil rights legislation, has announced that he will personally take over the prosecution of the retrial because, as state AG, he won't be subject to the pressures that local prosecutors might face. The sensational case has drawn worldwide attention, as well as a move to have the KKK investigated by the House Un-American Activities Committee. Wilkins is never convicted by an Alabama court (thus escaping the electric chair), but is found guilty of civil rights violations in a subsequent Federal trial.

*Fun fact: Flowers' son, Richmond Jr., was a football player at Tennessee and went on to play in the NFL for the Dallas Cowboys and the New York Giants. (He chose Tennessee over Alabama because of his father's controversial politics.) He was also a star hurdler, a contender to make the 1968 Olympic team (a torn hamstring prevented him from qualifying), and was known at the time as "the fastest white boy alive."

l  l  l

Let's continue with the sports theme for a moment. The World Series has ended, and now the spotlight turns fully to football. (Another sign of how the times have changed; today, it's the World Series that fights for a place in the spotlight.) The college game of the week on Saturday features a Southwestern Conference showdown between two of the nation's top teams, #1 Texas and #3 Arkansas (1:00 p.m., NBC). Arkansas, after blowing a 20-0 lead, rallies to defeat Texas 27-24. Four years later, the two teams will play "The Game of the Century" for the national championship; once again, Arkansas jumps out to a lead, but Texas rallies in the fourth quarter to win the game and the national title, 15-14. Today, the SWC is but a distant memory, while the two teams compete in the Southeastern Conference.

I discussed musical tastes earlier in the "Sullivan vs. The Palace" feature; Monday night offers us plenty of the same, beginning with Hullabaloo (7:30 p.m., NBC), where host Paul Anka welcomes the Supremes, Leslie Uggams, the Back Porch Majority, and jazz dancer David Winters. Later, it's the 18th  season premiere of Perry Como's Kraft Music Hall (9:00 p.m., NBC), with Perry joining singer Nancy Ames in a look back at the radio days of Kraft Music Hall, beginning with the Bing Crosby and Al Jolson days of the Thirties and Forties, and through the Fifties, when Perry himself took over. And I'll bet you get plenty of fall recipes during the commercial breaks.

On Tuesday, CBS presents master documentarian David L. Wolper's adaptation of Theodore White's best-seller The Making of the President 1964 (9:30 p.m.). Neither the book nor the documentary have quite the cachet of White's original 1960 book (and subsequent documentary), but it's still a valuable portrait of the tumultuous 1964 campaign, as LBJ tries to step out of the shadow of JFK. As with the previous documentary, stage actor (and frequent What's My Line? guest panelist) Martin Gabel provides the dignified narration.*

*Elsewhere in this week's issue is this ad for the John F. Kennedy half-dollar coin set, a valuable collectors item as silver is being phased out of coin-making. Is the placement a coincidence?  And what about that Dallas mailing address?

Barbra Streisand burst onto the television scene in April 1965 with her special "My Name Is Barbra," and CBS repeats the Emmy-winning show on Wednesday night (10:00 p.m.) It tops off a night of great variety that started with the 15th season opener of Hallmark Hall of Fame (7:30 p.m., NBC) and its original drama "Eagle in a Cage," the story of Napoleon's exile to the island of St. Helena and his plot to return to France, starring Trevor Howard and James Daly. (Admit it: can you see Hall of Fame showing something like that today? Not enough of a chick flick, I'd say.) That's followed by a Bob Hope Special (9:00 p.m., NBC), with Bob and his guests James Garner, We Five, Carol Lawrence, and Phyllis Diller. 

I couldn't possibly get through this week's music programs without stopping on Thursday to see the unexpecdted spectacle of Hedy Lamarr hosting Shindig (7:30 p.m., ABC), with the Dave Clark Five, the Kingsmen, Joe Tex, Brenda Holloway, and Lulu and the Luvvers. Over on NBC, Dean Martin (10:00 p.m.) has a stellar lineup with Louis Armstrong and his combo, Robert Goulet, Lainie Kazan, the Kirby Stone Four, the dance team of Brascia and Tybee, and the comic contortionists Trio Leema. And if you didn't get enough Frank Sinatra on The Hollywood Palace, there's more, with the network TV premiere of the original Ocean's 11 (9:00 p.m.), the Rat Pack romp co-starring the aforementioned Dean Martin, Sammy Davis Jr., Peter Lawford, Joey Bishop, Angie Dickinson, and a movie-stealing Cesar Romero.

Awards shows haven't quite progressed to the point where they're stand-alone programs. The Golden Globes, for example, were a feature for several years on The Andy Williams Show, and on Friday night the Country Western Music Awards are handed out on The Jimmy Dean Show (10:00 p.m., ABC). Buck Owens, Merle Haggard, Norma Jean Beasler, Del Reeves, and the team of Roy Drusky and Priscilla Mitchell are among the performers, and Tex Ritter and Roy Acuff are on hand as presenters. The show runs the typical one hour; nowadays, it seems as if there's a Country music awards show every other week. What's that? You say there is?

l  l  l

Some interesting feedback in the Letters to the Editor section regarding a writer's roundtable featured in an issue that I wrote about many years ago. There's an interesting response from Howard Bell, the NAB Code Authority Director, who takes issue with the idea that the Code is responsible for the decline in TV drama. "[T]he TV code is not designed to stifle creativity in writers, nor does it do so in actual practice," Bell writes, quoting extensively from Section 1 of the Code: "It is in the interest of television as a vital medium to encourage and promote the broadcast of programs presenting genuine artistic or literary material, valid moral and social issues, significant controversial and challenging adult themes." While the Code isn't responsible for television's premier dramas, Bell writes, neither has it been a deterrent. If there has been a decline in the quality of television drama, there are undoubtedly reasons for it, but "from the Code Authority point of view, the excuse of censorship through the TV Code is misleading."

Leo Monaghan of Springfield, Massachusetts, also sees the issue of censorship as a straw man, pointing out that "Movies, paperbacks and magazines have amply shown that elimination of censorship is not the answer to mediocrity, but merely an invitation to degradation." According to Monaghan, the answer is not license, but talent. And while Maureen Bendich of Saratoga, Colorado, says that the article was "appalling and stimulating," suggesting that she sympathizes with the writers, she says it also "confirms my impressions that there is no room left for creativity." Finally, Robert Shaw, a "visiting Briton" writing from Jamaica, New York (the Robert Shaw, perhaps?), finds the whole thing ironic, having "been lectured on the 'evils' of government-controlled TV [i.e. the BBC] compared to the free enterprise system, as practiced here where 'no censorship exists.'" It's not clear whether Shaw finds the complaining or the assertion of no censorship to be the most humorous.

l  l  l

The networks lost a combined $10,000,000 in revenue during their coverage of Pope Paul VI's historic visit to New York City earlier in October, but it was worth it, as Henry Harding reports they "rose magnificently to the occasion." The networks devoted virtually all of October 4 to coverage of the papal visit, with 90 pool cameras broadcasting images to over 140 million viewers during the 14 hours of coverage, including a high point of 70,000,000 at one point. Compared to "the esteem and gratitude of millions of viewers," the loss of revenue may be well worth it.

And they could use it, according to Samuel Grafton, in the first of a three-part series on how television covers the news. His question: does TV news really give the viewer the whole story? His answer: no. It's quite interesting, and another indication of how times have changed, that the article is full of comparisons between television and newspapers. NBC's Reuven Frank, for example, says that "A television news show is a front page. It is not a full news service, like a complete newspaper." Washington correspondent Clark Mollenhoff, who covers the capital for the Des Moines Register and Tribune and the Minneapolis Star and Tribune, says, "They touch the surface," but to do anything further would take "depth knowledge of a subject, which they don't have, or don't have time to acquire." Even Walter Cronkite, in a recent interview on the educational station WNDT, admits that "I do not think we cover the news"

Grafton compares the newspaper reporter, who "works through contacts he develops over the years, with many people, great and small," with the television reporter, who "comes through like a parade, with his truck and his cameras." Complicating things is television's fear of boring viewers, requiring them to reduce stories "to a small enough compass so that the viewer can take all of it," unlike the newspaper reader who commits himself to a thorough review of the daily paper. For the same reason, television news avoids stories that lack mass attention—"news of music, of the theater, paintings and new books." As Frank says, although "[t]here's no subject that can't be covered on television," it should only be covered if it's of interest to the layman—"not if it is interested only in a specialist's way."

By comparison, local television news is seen as a strength of the medium. Now, most sane people today consider local news to be pretty much, not to put it too delicately, crap. The "if it bleeds, it leads" mentality, combined with the boy-girl happy news anchor teams, most of which look as if they're auditioning for a fashion runway rather than the newsdesk, has heavily influenced network television. However, the advantage that local news had in the mid-1960s was that its audience was interested—these were stories that had a direct impact on viewers, ranging from commentaries to reviews of new plays.

The lack of commentary on television news is particularly striking, since the three major anchors—Cronkite, Huntley, and Brinkley—all have five-minute daily radio spots in which they often make pointed comments. Why radio and not TV? Huntley acknowledges that "We're still feeling our way on television. We'd feel naked on TV doing a one-and-a-half-minute think piece." Lacking commentary, there's always hard-hitting reporting, but even here, television falls short. According to Raymond Brand, an editor at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, it's because TV newsmen are too worried about their own images, too "dignified" and respectful, to lower themselves into the muck. CBS's Fred Friendly hopes this changes; "We want yeast. We want savvy. We want what comes out of a reporter's deep experience. Our reporters are going to dig, not just read."

Much as was the case with that drama writers' roundtable, the main obstacle to television news seems to be a sort of censorship, a reluctance to go beyond self-set limitations. But with expenditures of over $100 million annually, it's clear that television news won't remain static.

l  l  l

MST3K alert: The Amazing Transparent Man (1959) A scientist enlists a convicted safecracker to help him steal radioactive material using the scientist's newly-developed method for turning a person invisible. Marguerite Chapman, Douglas Kennedy. Typical of the time, this sci-fi non-epic concludes with military personnel contemplating the prospects of an all-invisible army. Would that they had made the short, the Union Pacific safety film The Days of the Years, invisible; it's fortunate for the nation's economy that Union Pacific is better with the railways than with filmmaking.  TV


If you enjoy the content here and want to support my broader creative work, please consider making a donation at my Ko-fi page. Any amount you contribute helps me continue writing, researching, and sharing these articles and projects. Thank you!

June 20, 2025

Around the dial




It came as a revelation to me, many years ago, to see a reference in an old TV Guide to "Win" Martindale. At first I assumed it was a typo, but as we can see in this post from the Broadcast Archives, Wink Martindale was known, for a time, as Win. Either way you look at it, he was one of game show history's biggest winners.

At Comfort TV, David's journey through 1970s TV takes us to Monday nights, 1976. The highlight, of course, was Monday Night Football, but for every touchdown (Little House), there's an incomplete pass or two: The Captain and Tennille, All's Fair, Executive Suite. Stick to the movies and the game.

John returns to the world of the private detective at Cult TV Blog, with a look at the Shoestring episode "Find the Lady," with our heroic private "ear" on the trail of a murder—or is it? Check out an interesting story with a stellar guest cast.

At Captain Video's Secret Sanctum, we take a look at 2009's Spaceballs: The Animated Series, which ran for 13 episodes, and is pretty much exactly what you'd expect from an animated Mel Brooks project. I wonder what I was doing that I don't remember this?

Does a movie count as TV if you saw it on your television? It does in this case, as at Classic Film and TV Corner, Maddy reviews the top four performances from one of the all-time greats, Toshiro Mifune. I've seen all four of these movies, and I can't argue with a one of them; they're all superb.

Speaking of superb, at The View from the Junkyard, Roger reviews the concluding episode of The New Avengers, "Emily," which serves as a fitting end to the series, "a celebration of everything this show does best."

At A Shroud of Thoughts, Terence pays tribute to the legendary Brian Wilson, who died last week at 82. He was certainly a familiar face on television in the 1960s, given the prominence of the Beach Boys, and one of those tortured geniuses who accomplished so much, and paid a price for it.

Martin Grams is back with another selection of book reviews designed to appeal to the TV and film buff in you. I mention these not just because they sound interesting, but to remind me that I have a pile of books to review myself, all on hold while I finished my own book. Which is done, by the way.

And that leads to my reminder that if you'd like to sign up for updates on Darkness in Primetime: How Classic-Era TV Foresaw Modern Society's Descent into Hell, you can do so at this link. There's another reveal next week leading up to the August release date; why not take a moment to sign up? TV  

June 13, 2025

Around the dial




Let's kick things off this week with one of my favorite British detectives, Frank Marker, as played by Alfred Burke in Public Eye. But this isn't about either Frank or Alfred; it's the finale of the "Sylvia Coleridge Season" at Cult TV Blog, and I'll forgive John for ending the season since he's chosen well: the episode "No Orchids for Marker."

At Comfort TV, David looks at some of our classic shows to see what they have to say about the ubiquitous computer, which was a thing to behold back then—and something to be feared. The question that these shows posed: can the computer be trusted? 

The Broadcast Archives celebrated Game Show Wednesday this week with a look at the "Golden Age" of game shows, at least in number: the 1970s. They were everywhere, and I'm willing to bet you're going to recognize at least one or two of the hosts pictured.

Jack's Hitchcock Project returns at barebones e-zine with "Act of Faith," a seventh season episode written by Nicholas Monsarrat, starring George Grizzard and Dennis King. It is, as Jack says, a curious choice for a Hitchcock episode; you'll have to see whether or not it works.

At The View from the Junkyard, Roger continues to survey The A-Team, and points out that this week's episode, "The Out-of-Towners," keeps a trend going: that of the team taking on missions to right wrongs, rather than purely as mercenaries. It's part of what makes the show fun.

Television's New Frontier: The 1960s is back with the 1962 episodes of The Danny Thomas Show, and I'm always amazed that a show as successful as this was, with a star as big as Thomas was, can become so obscure today. Or maybe it's just me, I don't know.

At A Shroud of Thoughts, Terence bids farewell to Pippa Scott, a frequent presence on classic TV over the years, who died last month at the age of 90. If you had a favorite show back in those days, the chances are excellent that she was on it.

Better twice than never: at Drunk TV, Paul reprises a piece from Mavis Movie Madness on NBC's 60th anniversary show in 1986. I think it's safe to say that both Paul and I have our doubts about how well it worked, and what it may augur for the 100th anniversary show coming up. TV  

September 25, 2024

If I ran the network, part 5


Earlier this year, I introduced a new feature, "If I Ran the Network," a series of TV concepts that would never have made it to the small screen without network executives screwing them up. If you have similar ideas, please share them in the comments section; if I get enough, I'll use them to put together a complete prime-time lineup for the fictional HBC Network!

One of the games we play, you and I, is to recast our favorite movies and TV shows of the past, using the stars of today. You see it on social media all the time: "If you were remaking [fill in the blank] today, who would you cast as [star]? We all do it, I think. Studios do it too, albeit with much higher stakes, and it doesn't often work. 

One of the risks involved in resurrecting a classic show of the past is to decide whether it wants to be a resurrection, keeping the new version as close to the original as possible; or a reboot, in which case everything—time, place, technology—is brought up to date, with varying degress of success. For example, the new verison of Frasier is, I would suggest, a resurrection, while the new Matlock is a reboot. And while it's important, if you're considering such a move, to choose correctly—resurrection or reboot—it's perhaps even more important, once you've made your choice, to stick to it. Don't backtrack, don't fudge, don't change your mind in the middle of the process.

When What's My Line? finished its original run in 1967, it wasn't but a year before the show came back in a five-days-a-week syndicated version, but make no mistake: even though the basics of the game remained the same, this was no resurrection; it was a reboot, pure and simple. Gone was the formality of the past; instead of panelists dressed in tuxedos and evening gowns and addressed as "Mr." or "Miss," we were now on a first-name basis with the celebrities, who now dressed in a much more casual manner. Instead of the urbanity (and verbosity) of John Charles Daly, the program was now hosted by  actor and veteran game show host Larry Blyden (after one year in which the host was jouranlist Wally Bruner). Gone were the wit and humor of panelists like Bennett Cerf; instead we got the much broader comedy of Soupy Sales and Nipsey Russell. Contestants no longer came on the show only to stump the panel; on occasion they would also demonstrate their line, if it was an entertaining one. As I say, a reboot rather than a resurrection.

I'm not saying this is necessarily a bad thing, mind you; Soupy and Nipsey were funny guys, and Arlene Francis was still on the panel. The syndicated version had a pretty successful run. It's just that it's missing what made What's My Line? one of my favorite programs in the first place, and it's not what I had in mind when I pondered what a new version would look like. 

First things first: nobody can replace John Charles Daly. I've said it before, and I'll say it again now: John Daly is who I want to be when I grow up. But a show has to have a host, and I always felt that one person who might have been able to pull it off, who could approximate a modicum of the urbanity and formality of the original, while maintaining control over the panel, was James Lipton. He was terrific on Inside the Actors Studio, he was smart and experienced when it came to television, and he was self-effacing enough to laugh at lampoons of his own propensity for pomposity. 

Just as John Daly had Bennett Cerf for a foil, James Lipton would need one as well, and who better to serve in the role than Charles Grodin? If he was half as effective as he was as a guest with Johnny Carson, he'd have been perfect; I also suspect that, like Cerf, he would have been very good at the game. The two women on the panel, Julia Louis-Dreyfus and Robin Roberts, win their way on the panel through a combination of smarts and quick thinking; I think they both would have been very good while maintaining the sense of formality that I was looking for. And rounding out the panel, we have Neil Patrick Harris, who strikes me as someone who'd actually enjoy being on WML. There's our regular cast of characters, with plenty of room for occasional guest panelists.

Of course, neither James Lipton nor Charles Grodin are with us today, so my concept would require some retooling. Speaking of Frasier as we were, though, I could see Kelsey Grammer taking the place of either one of them; let's make him the host, though, since Frasier Crane wouldn't have settled for being a mere panelist. In place of Grodin: Anderson Cooper, perhaps? Jon Stewart? Dennis Miller? Piers Morgan, for an international flavor? 

Naturally, the network would never go for it. They'd want a panel made up entirely of stand-up comedians doing their routines, just fitting in a question here and there. Same for the mystery guest. No, I'm very much afraid that today's WML would be loud, crude, political, woke.  And forget the formal wear and means of address; nobody talks or dresses like that nowadays. 

The problem with a resurrection of What's My Line? is that it would be clever, witty, sophisticated, literate, and genteel. In other words, everything we aren't today. TV